Kết quả phục hồi xoang sâu bằng Composite đắp lớp và Composite nguyên khối

Comparison of clinical performance of class I and class II cavities using 3M Filtek One Bulk Fill Composite and 3M Filtek Z350XT Composite. Subjects and methods: A randomized controlled trial evaluating the clinical performance of class I and class II cavities restoration with 3M Filtek Z350XT composite using the conventional incremental technique verser 3M One BulkFill composite using the bulk-fill technique on 15 patients (21 pairs of teeth) from March 2024 to October 2024. Treatment efficacy was evaluated at 3 time points: immediately, after 1 week and after 3 months. Results: At baseline and at 1 week, and 3 months of follow-up according to the FDI 2010; there were no significant differences in the clinical status of both groups of restorations. The median time ± interquartile range was 368,67 ± 34,44 seconds for the bulk-fill technique and 496±48,40 for the conventional incremental technique (p < 0.005). Conclusion: Using the bulk fill technique for restorations with the Filtek Bulk Fill material seems to be equally efficient as using the incremental fill technique. On the other hand, the use of the bulk-fill base technique instead of the conventional incremental technique leads to significant time - savings when restoring composite fillings.