Website được thiết kế tối ưu cho thành viên chính thức. Hãy Đăng nhập hoặc Đăng ký để truy cập đầy đủ nội dung và chức năng. Nội dung bạn cần không thấy trên website, có thể do bạn chưa đăng nhập. Nếu là thành viên của website, bạn cũng có thể yêu cầu trong nhóm Zalo "NCKH Members" các nội dung bạn quan tâm.

Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng và kết quả xử trí vết thương xuyên vùng rìa

nckh
Thông tin nghiên cứu
Loại tài liệu
Bài báo trên tạp chí khoa học (Journal Article)
Tiêu đề
Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng và kết quả xử trí vết thương xuyên vùng rìa
Tác giả
Đỗ Như Hơn; Bùi Cẩm Hương
Năm xuất bản
2011
Số tạp chí
1
Trang bắt đầu
1-3
ISSN
1859-1868
Abstract

Objectives: to describe the clinical characteristics and to evaluate the treatment result of limbal penetrating lesions. Patients and methods: patients with limbal penetrating injuries who were treated in Department of Traumatology, VNIO from 1/2010 to 5/2010 with follow up time from 3 to 6 months. A perspective and descriptive study. Results: 39 patients (39 eyes) mainly were male (87.2 percent). Most of them were at working age (87.6 percent) and most of injuries were home accidents (56.4 percent) from pieces of glass, wood, stone or steel. 2/3 of patients came to hospital before 24.hours (range, 1 hour to 1 month). The lesions were: incarceration of intraocular structures (87.2 percent) (of which iris incarceration accounted for 84.6 percent), lens injuries (33.3 percent), vitreous hemorrhage (46.2 percent). Most commonly seen complication was retinal detachment (30.8 percent) and most dangerous one was sympathetic ophthalmia (5.3 percent). Patients were usually hospitalized in bad conditions: there were only VA 0.6 (7.7 percent), (66.7 percent) other patients had poor vision from LP to CF 1m. Treatment results;: fair result in 46.2 percent; good in 25.6 percent and poor in 28.2 percent. More than half achieved good anatomical result (53.8 percent). 13 eyes (30.8 percent) had fair and 6 (15.4 percent) had poor anatomical outcome. VA improved gradually (p0.05) however, there was no difference between admission and discharge Vas. Thanks to advances in penetrating injuries management VA at 3 months was 25.6 percent better than 0.6 and 23.1 percent from LP to 0.02. Conclusion: The lesions of limbal injuries were: incarceration of intraocular structures (87.2 percent) (of which iris incarceration accounted for 84.6 percent), lens injuries (33.3 percent), vitreous hemorrhage (46.2 percent). Treatment results: fair result in 46.2 percent, good in 25.6 percent and poor in 28.2 percent with poor VA outcome. Complications were retinal detachment: 30.8 percent, cataract 28.2 percent, sympathetic ophthalmia 5.1 percent.